Posted by eemilla on January 30, 2009
We are fast approaching the half year mark, and I am so amazed about how easy this has been. In honesty, I must say my husband bears the greater burden. Now that we are not suffering from the bitter snowless cold, I plan to resume my Thursday treks home. I actually walked past three other pedestrians in the neighborhood, and I also felt like an old lady as I wanted to yell at a few cars to SLOW DOWN as they whizzed by me. Although I spend much time complaining about the dearth of sidewalks, I must say I do appreciate the good long stretch of new sidewalk on my amended route. The sad and inefficient note about this stretch is that they had sidewalks already, but no one had bothered to maintain them so they became a part of people’s yards.
Speaking of public transit and government waste, I wanted to give thanks to Doug Gibson over at Scrutiny Hooligans for his great comeback: “When did I-40 start making a profit?” How can public transit be profitable if we live so far from everything and we don’t pay tolls? How much sense does it make to spend millions on a parking deck then charge one dollar an hour to park there with an eight dollar per day maximum? The newest downtown parking deck was estimated to cost $12 million dollars for 650 parking spaces, which breaks down to over $18,000 per space. The notice doesn’t mention if this lot will be like the other decks that give the first hour for free, but I assume being closest to the courthouse this will not be an option.
I think the economic stimulus will push us in a new direction as far as our transportation priorities fall; gas prices will rise again as oil is not a renewable resource, and the demand for transit will increase. The Asheville Transit System seems really interested in listening to its ridership; hopefully, more service will arrive before Strive Not to Drive.
Posted in politics | Tagged: bus service, energy, environment, gas, green, oil, one car household, peak oil, public transit, transportation | 3 Comments »
Posted by eemilla on September 3, 2008
So we tried back in 2005 right after Katrina to be a one car household, but alas the experiment failed after less than one month. I did not have the dedication, but I also feel like more of the sacrifice was mine. Last week my husband had an automobile accident, in which (thankfully!!!) no one was injured. However, his car was deemed a total loss. Rather than deal with a salvaged title, we decided that we could try again to become a one car household.
So it has been a week, and we are both still hopeful and enthusiastic about our decision. We have a new mantra about this is going to save so much money, and how we are doing something more for the environment. We have been using fluorescent light bulbs for the past three to four years; we recycle and reuse all that we can. We have used cotton bags for the past few years, and we have composted our food waste for the past several years. For the ten or so years that we have lived together we have never really eaten meat, and I rarely order it when we go out. But this seems like a major step. We are both proud to ride the bus and walk. Once I get the brakes on my bike fixed, I do plan to put the bike back into the transit plans. Everyone has laughed and said this won’t last long; how can you possibly do without two cars since you both work? I think this is good for me especially as I am competitive, and I do relish proving people wrong (yep that is my mean streak).
Whoo Hooo! We are a one car family.
Posted in politics | Tagged: environment, green, oil, transportation | 1 Comment »
Posted by eemilla on July 24, 2008
Recently I happened upon the Senate Environment and Public Works committee’s hearing on the science of global warming, and unfortunately I only caught the opening remarks. I was struck by Senator Kitt Bond’s comments; they so irked me that I felt compelled to rebut (albeit my rebuttal will not mirror Senator Bond’s remarks).
No doubt that Senator Bond is hearing from his constituents that their budgets are being gravely affected by the precipitous rise in gas prices over the last several months. Of course the price of fuels is adversely affecting everything else that we purchase so the damage is compounded. However, there are several dangerous attitudes and policies that have brought America to this crisis level. First, the denial that oil is a non-renewable resource coupled with the fact that we have so much space in this country. Secondly, the free market so proudly expounded by Republicans is addicted to graft which has encouraged stagnation and greed rather than innovation and true resourcefulness. Finally, this republic needs to live up to its ideals and think forward rather than cling to the same old decaying matter.
As President Bush so simply stated, we are addicted to oil. Therefore, anyone suggesting that more oil is the answer is concerned at best with winning political points for a seemingly quick, short term solution or at worst appeasing their lobbyists. More drilling is not the answer for the current sharp increase in oil; as we have not been able to grasp with the failed war on drugs, the problem isn’t supply. It is our unceasing, constantly increasing demand (coupled with growing worldwide demand). Not being intimately knowledgeable about the worldwide oil supply, I want to push the debate to the future. The supply may or may not have reached or surpassed its peak; it does not matter because the oil will not flow forever regardless of its current status. The other growing economies in this world will be vying for oil just as we are. Another regime change could cut off supply drastically tomorrow. Therefore, it would behoove us to find cheaper and less detrimental forms of energy. America should lead by example in this front, but we first have to recall that neither drilling for oil now nor creating new energy and transportation infrastructure will produce instant relief.
Producing this new infrastructure would create new industry and jobs, however. What a wonderful solution to the jobs Senator Bond spoke of being shipped off shore. My region, too, has seen the loss of good paying manufacturing jobs; these jobs have been replaced by low paying service sector jobs that rarely offer benefits or rarely have a full time work force. Although we have a few bright spots were a plant has actually hired new employees, the bulk of those employees are temporary, and any recent expansion or move to the area is incentivized by tax money. Our region is also incentivizing current employers who are threatening to relocate without the incentives. As tax dollars are already subsidizing the industry, the money would be better spent on creating renewable energy infrastructure and public transportation options like light rail or increased bus service in more suburban areas. Green collar jobs are the future of American industry as well as of our economic health and literal health.
Of course the most obvious way to prevent the hemorrhaging of good paying full time employment is to stop free trade deals that do not require reciprocal labor and environmental standards. Although this option would not likely effect fuel prices in the direct sense, families would probably be more able to cope with the increase if more Americans were fully employed rather than being either underemployed or unemployed. Furthermore, holding businesses to the high American standards for cleanliness would encourage them to innovate in order to maintain their bottom line which would reduce pollution and insufferable labor conditions worldwide (again not an instant fix).
Failing to let go of fossil fuels will leave this country crumbling; we cannot stand idly by, clutching our dirty energy security blanket. The American Dream is about living better than your parents, but we cannot, while holding on to any scrap of our ideals, pass the buck and let our future generations take the fall. Upholding our own labor and environmental standards will stanch the flow of outsourced jobs while helping to peacefully export our ideals. Ending corporate welfare will encourage American firms to undertake the task of weaning us off of non-renewable energy by fostering innovation and resourcefulness rather than encouraging stagnation and sloth. Times are not easy nor will they likely become any better until we free ourselves from oil domination.
Posted in politics | Tagged: corporate welfare, energy, free trade, oil, outsourcing, peak oil, Senator Kitt Bond | Leave a Comment »